How much does Pendo cost?

Pendo does not publish prices for any paid tier. The permanent Free plan supports up to 500 MAUs. Based on buyer reports and Vendr data, the Base plan starts at approximately $7,000-$15,000/year; Core at $20,000-$60,000/year; and Ultimate at $75,000-$200,000+/year for higher MAU tiers. All paid plans require a sales conversation.

What is Pendo's free plan?

Pendo's Free plan supports up to 500 MAUs with Product Analytics, In-app Guides, and Pendo-branded NPS at no cost. It is a permanent free tier, not a trial. Exceeding 500 MAUs blocks creating new guides, surveys, or segments until you upgrade to a paid plan.

Why do Pendo guides break?

Pendo guides attach to UI elements using CSS selectors. When applications use React, Angular, or other frameworks with dynamically generated class names, these selectors become unstable. Common failure modes include dynamic CSS selectors that change between builds, nth-child rules breaking when element order changes, z-index conflicts hiding guides, and URL pattern mismatches when routing changes. Pendo's own documentation warns: 'Dynamic CSS selectors are typically class names or element IDs that are likely to change due to activity in the application.'

Does Pendo support mobile apps?

Yes - Pendo has native iOS and Android SDKs with support for React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, and Expo. Mobile capabilities include codeless analytics, retroactive data collection, in-app guides, and mobile session replay. Mobile requires approximately 3 lines of code to integrate.

What is the difference between Gainsight PX and Gainsight CS?

Gainsight CS is the customer success management platform (health scoring, playbooks, renewal workflows, CSM productivity). Gainsight PX is the product experience and digital adoption platform (in-app guides, product analytics, tooltips, NPS). They are separate products sold separately or together. PX delivers its strongest value when connected to CS for health score integration.

How much does Gainsight PX cost?

Gainsight publishes no PX prices. Its pricing page offers Request Pricing and a PX free trial sign-up, with no trial length stated. Vendr, a third-party buying platform, reports a median about $49,900/year across 373 purchases of all Gainsight products, not only PX, ranging from $13,914-$185,553. Vendr reports PX alone at $30,000-$70,000/year for 10,000-50,000 MAUs, PX plus CS bundles typically starting above $100,000/year, and implementation often at 20-40% of the first-year subscription.

How long does Gainsight PX implementation take?

G2 data and user reviews consistently place Gainsight PX among the slowest DAPs to implement, with 3-6 months commonly reported. The primary bottleneck is product mapping: defining every feature, module, and user journey before engagements can be targeted. Teams describe the learning curve as steep and the mapping process as less intuitive than competing tools.

What is Gainsight PX product mapping?

Product mapping is Gainsight PX's system for defining your product's structure - every feature, module, and user journey - within the platform before in-app engagements can be targeted to specific areas. Every time you change your UI, add features, or redesign flows, the product map must be manually updated. Multiple G2 reviewers note that for weekly-shipping teams, product map maintenance can become a full-time job.

Looking for an AI-native alternative to Pendo or Gainsight PX? Meet Obi, the AI agent that guides every customer through your product live. Learn more

COMPARISON

Pendo vs Gainsight PX: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Quick answer: Choose Pendo for enterprise product teams that need behavioral analytics, or Gainsight PX for teams already using Gainsight CS that want connected product and health data. Pendo's starting price is Free up to 500 MAUs; paid plans are custom-quoted; Vendr median $48,500/year; Gainsight PX's is No published prices; Vendr reports $30,000-$70,000/year for 10,000-50,000 MAUs. Check the billing terms and included features below before comparing total costs.

Last updated September 2026

Article · June 2026 · 9 min read

How these tools differ

Pendo is a fit for enterprise product teams that need behavioral analytics, while Gainsight PX is a fit for teams already using Gainsight CS that want connected product and health data. Their pricing differs: Pendo is listed at Free up to 500 MAUs; paid plans are custom-quoted; Vendr median $48,500/year, compared with No published prices; Vendr reports $30,000-$70,000/year for 10,000-50,000 MAUs for Gainsight PX. For a further distinction, our Pendo review lists organizations with stable product UIs and dedicated Pendo admin resources, while our Gainsight PX review lists organizations with dedicated product operations and CS operations teams. Compare the tools in this category.

Sources

https://pendo.io/pricing

https://g2.com/products/pendo-io-pendo/reviews

https://capterra.com/p/151951/Pendo-Platform/reviews

https://vendr.com/marketplace/pendo

https://support.pendo.io

https://userpilot.com/blog/pendo-pricing

https://www.gainsight.com/pricing/

https://gainsight.com/product-experience

https://g2.com/products/gainsight-px/reviews

https://capterra.com/p/188424/Gainsight-PX

https://vendr.com/marketplace/gainsight

https://userpilot.com/blog/gainsight-px

Pricing side by side

Pendo

MAU-based (Monthly Active Users) plus feature tier bundles. Not seat-based. Cost per MAU decreases as volume increases. Prices are not published and require sales contact.

Gainsight PX

MAU-based plus custom quote. No official public pricing exists. Vendr's third-party median is about $49,900/year across 373 purchases of all Gainsight products, not only PX; the observed range is $13,914-$185,553.

Free

Up to 500 MAUs

PX Only

Vendr third-party: $30,000-$70,000/year

10,000-50,000 MAUs (Vendr estimate)

Base

~$7,000-$15,000/year (buyer reports)

Up to ~2,000 MAUs (custom)

PX + CS Bundle

Vendr third-party: typically starts above $100,000/year

MAU-based, custom

Core

~$20,000-$60,000/year depending on MAU volume

Custom MAU tiers

Full Suite

Request Pricing

Custom

Ultimate

~$75,000-$200,000+/year at higher MAU tiers

Custom (often multi-year)

Read the full breakdowns: Pendo pricing · Gainsight PX pricing

Features side by side

Pendo

Product Analytics
Retroactive data collection, paths, funnels, retention cohorts, Data Explorer, and Product Engagement Score. One of the deepest native analytics suites in the DAP category.
In-App Guides
Tooltips, walkthroughs, lightboxes, banners, multi-step guides with conditional logic, and A/B testing. Attach to UI elements via CSS selectors.
NPS and Surveys
In-app and email delivery, follow-up questions, sentiment analysis, and AI-powered insights. NPS included on Base; full sentiment suite on Core/Ultimate or as add-on.
Session Replay
Visual playback of user sessions with cursor movements, clicks, scrolling, and rage click detection. Available as a premium add-on or included on Core and above.
Feedback and Listen
Feature request collection, user voting, AI-powered trend detection, and roadmap integration. A substantial module often priced as a significant add-on to base contracts.

Gainsight PX

Product Analytics and Usage Tracking
Track feature adoption and usage patterns with autonomous feature instrumentation, path analysis, funnel analysis, and user journey mapping at both account and user level.
In-App Engagements (Guides, Tooltips, Dialogs)
Create product tours and walkthroughs with contextual engagement delivery. Slider and banner guides, tooltip hotspots, and dialog-based announcements.
NPS and In-App Surveys
Collect structured user feedback via NPS and custom survey types. Feedback data can be linked to product usage analytics for correlation analysis.
Gainsight CS Integration
Connect product usage data to customer health scoring in Gainsight CS. Surface PX data as health score inputs, trigger CS playbooks from PX engagement data.
Knowledge Center Bot
Contextual resource center with in-app help content. Delivers documentation and guides inside the product. Requires product mapping to function effectively.

Maintenance burden

Scenario	Pendo	Gainsight PX
Established products with stable UI	4-8 hrs/mo	10-20 hrs/mo
Fast-growing products with frequent UI changes	15-25+ hrs/mo	20-40 hrs/mo

Pros and cons

Pendo pros

Deepest native analytics in the DAP category: retroactive data collection, funnels, retention cohorts, path analysis, and Product Engagement Score give product teams genuine behavioral depth without requiring a separate analytics tool
Powerful segmentation engine: target guides, analytics, and messaging by account tier, user behavior, or metadata using AND/OR logic - segments are reusable across analytics and in-app messaging, enabling precise personalization without engineering involvement
Comprehensive all-in-one platform: replaces multiple tools (analytics, surveys, feedback management, and in-app guides) in a single subscription - reducing vendor sprawl for product teams managing the full user adoption lifecycle
Native mobile SDK support: full iOS and Android feature parity including session replay, in-app guides, and codeless analytics - a key differentiator versus competitors with web-only or paid-add-on mobile support

Gainsight PX pros

Deep customer success integration if using Gainsight CS: PX provides seamless integration that connects product usage data to customer health scoring, playbooks, and workflows. For enterprise CS teams managing hundreds or thousands of accounts, this creates a unified view combining behavioral data (PX) with relationship data (CS). Userpilot acknowledges: Gainsight PX excels at aggregating product usage across accounts and correlating those metrics with customer health scores.
Comprehensive account-level analytics for enterprise B2B: unlike user-centric tools, Gainsight PX is designed for enterprise B2B where you manage accounts with multiple seats. G2 reviewer: I love being able to view adoption by a client at the institution level - it helps us find clients who are not using the product so we can be proactive. For companies selling to enterprises with 50-500 users per account, this account-first view is critical.
Robust NPS/CSAT survey capabilities with automated workflows: Gainsight PX excels at collecting and acting on user feedback. Closed-loop workflows triggered by survey responses are particularly powerful for customer success teams - tying feedback directly to customer health and triggering playbooks automatically.
Enterprise-grade security and compliance: Gainsight is SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR compliant, and HIPAA compliant. The ISO/IEC 42001 AI management standard applies to Staircase AI, a Gainsight product, not PX. For heavily regulated industries, compliance is non-negotiable; evaluate the certifications applicable to the specific product.

Pendo cons

CSS selector fragility creates silent failures: guides attach via CSS selectors that break when developers update class names, IDs, or DOM structure - guides fail silently, z-index conflicts hide them, and dynamic React/Angular class names require constant developer involvement to maintain properly
Opaque and expensive pricing that scales poorly: no published prices at any paid tier, with median annual costs of approximately $49,015/year per Vendr data and 5-20% annual uplifts baked into multi-year contracts - total cost of ownership compounds significantly over time
Critical features locked behind expensive tiers: session replay, sentiment surveys, Resource Center, and journey orchestration all require Core or Ultimate plans or paid add-ons - the Base plan is limited relative to its price point
Approximately 1-hour data latency limits real-time use: Pendo does not process event data in real time and cannot trigger guides based on immediate user actions - ad blocker interference can also suppress events and break guide sequences entirely

Gainsight PX cons

Product mapping creates an unsustainable maintenance burden: every time you ship a new feature, tweak a user flow, or redesign part of your interface, you need to manually update the product map. For teams shipping weekly or even daily, multiple G2 reviewers describe this as quickly becoming a full-time job.
Steep learning curve affects the entire organization: the UI is not self-explanatory and different people from different teams will have to invest serious time to understand even basic functions. Capterra: PX might be challenging to learn and master - it took us a while to master the product mapper and some of the analytical tools. This is not just an admin issue; product managers, marketers, and CS teams all struggle with complexity.
Quote-based pricing: Gainsight's pricing page offers Request Pricing and a PX free trial sign-up, but no list prices. Vendr, third-party, reports a median about $49,900/year and a range of $13,914-$185,553 across 373 purchases of all Gainsight products, not only PX. Buyers still need a quote to evaluate production costs.
Analytics suitable for reporting but not product discovery: Userpilot's assessment: Gainsight PX analytics can work fine for quarterly business reviews or high-level account health tracking. But if you are a product team trying to understand why users are not activating or which features drive retention, you will spend more time fighting the tool than using it. Reports are built for presentations, not deep investigation.

Obi vs both

Both Pendo and Gainsight PX rely on overlays or guides attached to your UI, which means ongoing maintenance as your product changes. Obi takes a different approach: a conversational AI agent that learns from your docs and video and adapts in real time, with no selectors to rebuild.

Obi vs Pendo

Pendo's analytics depth is a genuine competitive advantage that Obi does not match - if deep retroactive behavioral analytics, funnels, and retention cohorts are your primary need, Pendo is the stronger choice. Where Obi differs is in the onboarding experience itself: Obi's conversational AI model eliminates the CSS selector fragility that creates 15-25+ hours/month of maintenance for fast-shipping teams, and its usage-based pricing is transparent and predictable versus Pendo's opaque pricing and annual uplift practices. For teams choosing between deep analytics and maintenance-free onboarding, understanding which problem is more urgent determines the right tool.

Obi vs Gainsight PX

Gainsight PX's core value proposition - connecting product usage data to customer health scoring - requires buying and maintaining two products (PX and CS) and tolerating one of the category's longest implementation timelines. The product mapping architecture creates a maintenance bottleneck that scales with product velocity: faster-shipping teams face more maintenance, not less. Obi's document-learning approach eliminates the mapping bottleneck entirely. For teams that do not have a dedicated Gainsight CS deployment and need onboarding that delivers value quickly, PX's complexity and pricing represent a poor trade-off.

Frequently asked questions

Conclusion

Pendo and Gainsight PX address the same underlying problem but with different priorities. Pendo scores 8.9/10 and Gainsight PX scores 7.2/10 in our 2026 evaluation. Ongoing maintenance is a factor for both: Pendo reviewers report 15-25+ hrs/mo for fast-growing products with frequent ui changes, and Gainsight PX reviewers report 20-40 hrs/mo. The right tool depends on your use case, team size, and how much ongoing maintenance work you can absorb. For teams that want to reduce that maintenance burden, Obi takes a different approach: a conversational AI agent that learns from your documentation and adapts automatically when your product changes, with no CSS selectors or DOM tagging required.

High-touch onboarding
for every customer.
No extra headcount.

See how Obi could handle your existing onboarding process.