Skilljar vs Docebo (2026): Pricing, Features and Which to Pick

Looking for an AI-native alternative to Skilljar or Docebo? Meet Obi, the AI agent that guides every customer through your product live. Learn more

COMPARISON

Skilljar vs Docebo: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Quick answer: Choose Skilljar for customer education teams running certification and partner programs, or Docebo for training teams running employee, customer and partner academies. Skilljar's starting price is No published plan prices; Vendr median $38,972/year; Docebo's is $35,900/year for 500 yearly active users (AWS Marketplace; 3-year agreement billed annually). Check the billing terms and included features below before comparing total costs.

Last updated September 2026

Article · June 2026 · 9 min read

How these tools differ

Skilljar is a fit for customer education teams running certification and partner programs, while Docebo is a fit for training teams running employee, customer and partner academies. Their pricing differs: Skilljar is listed at No published plan prices; Vendr median $38,972/year, compared with $35,900/year for 500 yearly active users (AWS Marketplace; 3-year agreement billed annually) for Docebo. For a further distinction, our Skilljar review lists organizations wanting to correlate training completion with adoption, retention, and revenue in Salesforce/Gainsight, while our Docebo review lists teams running compliance, certification, and multi-audience academies (employee, customer, partner). Compare the tools in this category.

Sources

https://skilljar.com/customer-lms-pricing

https://skilljar.com/integrations

https://vendr.com/marketplace/skilljar

https://g2.com/products/skilljar-by-gainsight/reviews

https://capterra.com/p/136412/Skilljar/reviews

https://trustradius.com/products/skilljar/pricing

https://elearningindustry.com/directory/elearning-software/skilljar/pricing

https://support.skilljar.com/hc/en-us/articles/206086056-Sending-Data-to-HubSpot

https://docebo.com/pricing

https://docebo.com/ai-info

https://docebo.com/products/integrations

https://educate-me.co/blog/docebo-pricing

https://itqlick.com/docebo-lms/pricing

https://g2.com/products/docebo/reviews

https://capterra.com/p/127213/Docebo/reviews

https://trustradius.com/products/docebo-learning-platform/reviews

https://vendr.com/marketplace/docebo

01

Pricing side by side

Skilljar

Two-component model: subscription tier plus active-learner (MAU) fees. Quote-based, not public. Median buyer per Vendr: approximately $39,217/year. No free trial, no freemium.

Docebo

Quote-based enterprise pricing. Two tiers (Elevate and Enterprise) priced per active user (MAU, YAU, or RAU). No public pricing page. Several advanced capabilities (AI authoring, advanced analytics, extended enterprise, mobile app) are paid add-ons.

Essentials

Estimated approximately $30,000-$50,000/year for roughly 4,000 active learners (estimate, third-party)

1 Academy site; Essentials-scale active learner volume

Elevate

Custom quote (~$30,000-$50,000/year estimated)

Suited for mid-sized to large businesses with standard training needs

Professional

Estimated approximately $70,000-$100,000/year for roughly 28,000 active learners with common add-ons (estimate)

2 Academy sites; Professional-scale active learner volume

Enterprise

Custom quote (~$60,000-$100,000+/year estimated)

Large or complex global enterprises with multi-audience training

Enterprise

Typically $100,000+/year, fully custom (estimate)

3 Academy sites; Enterprise-scale active learner volume

Add-On Modules

Separate quote (each add-on priced independently)

Available as additions to either base tier

Read the full breakdowns: Skilljar pricing · Docebo pricing

02

Features side by side

Skilljar

  • Branded Training Academies

    Stand up one or more public, fully themed self-service learning sites for customers and partners, with a low-code page builder for landing pages and catalogs. Custom domains and branding.
  • Course Authoring and Learning Paths

    Build interactive courses from video, text, PDFs, links, and SCORM/AICC content; sequence them into guided learning paths and curricula. Supports SCORM, AICC, and LCMS web packages.
  • Certifications and Assessments

    Issue certificates and credentials, run quizzes and tests, and track completion. Popular for partner enablement and proof-of-competency programs.
  • Monetization and E-commerce

    Sell training via Stripe/PayPal, manage coupons and bundles, and run paid certification programs - a differentiator for companies that monetize education as a revenue stream.
  • CRM-Connected Analytics

    Push learning activity into Salesforce and Gainsight to correlate training with adoption, retention, and revenue. Skilljar's signature 'prove training ROI' story via deep CRM integration.
  • Automations and Virtual ILT

    Automations for enrollment, reminders, and notifications. Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) scheduling and management. Multi-site/multi-audience academies on Professional and Enterprise tiers.

Docebo

  • Docebo AI and Shape (AI Authoring)

    AI that helps generate and curate learning content. Shape can rephrase, rewrite, expand, and translate material and assemble courses in minutes with AI tagging and personalized content recommendations. Note: this AI builds the courses; it does not deliver live guidance to a customer in your product.
  • Multi-Audience Learning Suite

    One platform for employee, customer, and partner training, with Extended Enterprise to run separate branded academies/portals per audience from a single instance.
  • Course and Certification Management

    Structured courses, learning plans, certifications, compliance tracking, ILT/VILT (instructor-led and virtual), and self-enrollment academies with detailed completion and compliance reporting.
  • Branded Learner Experience and Mobile

    White-labeled web portal plus native (and Enterprise-branded) mobile apps with offline learning and gamification to drive engagement. Case studies cite 90%+ mobile app adoption and thousands of completions in weeks.
  • Reporting and Learning Analytics

    Standard reports on completions, scores, and compliance, plus Advanced Analytics (Enterprise or add-on) including custom dashboards. Some customers embed Amazon QuickSight for deeper learning insights.
  • Content and Engagement Add-Ons

    Off-the-shelf Content Library, AI Roleplay for sales and soft-skills practice, eCommerce to sell courses externally, Communities and Social Learning, Gamification, and Virtual Labs/VR Pack - each a separately priced module.
03

Maintenance burden

ScenarioSkilljarDocebo
Stable academy with settled catalog10-20 hrs/month15-30 hrs/month
Fast-growing or multi-product teams25-45+ hrs/month40-80+ hrs/month
04

Pros and cons

Skilljar pros

  • Purpose-built for customer and partner education: not a repurposed corporate/employee LMS - it is designed for external academies; reviewers cite a 'direct, measurable impact' on retention and revenue, plus strong certification and partner-training support
  • Excellent onboarding and implementation: 'Structured onboarding process,' 'responsive implementation managers,' and an 'exceptional team' are the most consistent praise points; getting a polished academy live is comparatively smooth
  • Easy, flexible course creation: 'Easy to create interactive courses with text, videos, links'; 'simple, clean interface - can complete steps without lots of clicks'; supports SCORM, video, PDFs, and more in one place
  • Deep CRM integration and ROI reporting: 'Seamless integration with business systems like Salesforce'; learning activity flows into Salesforce/Gainsight so teams can tie education to adoption and revenue - the platform's standout strength

Docebo pros

  • Powerful, enterprise-grade multi-audience platform: one system for employee, customer, and partner training with Extended Enterprise for separate branded academies; powers 2,000+ companies including Zoom, AWS, and Heineken; Zoom launched a learning center serving 600,000+ learners on Docebo
  • Strong reporting and tracking: reviewers consistently praise how users, courses, lesson plans, and reporting are organized, with reliable completion, score, and compliance tracking that scales - a genuine strength for formal, audited programs
  • AI-assisted content creation: Docebo AI and Shape speed up authoring by rephrasing, rewriting, expanding, translating, and auto-tagging content so teams can make engaging learning content in minutes, plus personalized recommendations for learners
  • Branded, mobile-first learner experience: polished white-label portals and native/branded mobile apps with offline learning and gamification drive real adoption (case studies cite 90%+ mobile adoption and thousands of completions in weeks)

Skilljar cons

  • Basic analytics, manual reporting: 'Analytics are a bit basic, especially if you don't have integrations'; 'no automated reports'; teams export data or pay for the Data Connector (~$25K add-on) to get deeper insight
  • Customization requires code: 'Very customizable - but you must understand CSS'; 'customization options via code snippets can be difficult to organize'; non-technical teams hit a wall on branding and layout
  • Expensive and quote-based: costs commonly run $30K-$100K+/year with no free trial and no public pricing; add-ons (Data Connector, Language Packs, Content Syndication) stack $10K-$25K each; 'prohibitive' for smaller or budget-conscious teams
  • No native mobile app and dated edges: learners are limited to the mobile browser (no downloadable app); some reviewers note the 'admin console confusing to navigate,' a 'slowed pace of updates,' and parts of the system 'feeling dated'

Docebo cons

  • Premium pricing and add-on stacking: 'The price is a little high compared to others'; total cost of ownership commonly starts approximately $25,000/year, and several advanced and AI capabilities (Content Library, advanced analytics, extended enterprise, premium connectors) are paid add-ons that inflate the total
  • Complex setup and steep admin learning curve: 'Initial setup can be complex and may require technical support'; 'because of so many features, the learning curve is quite steep,' especially for non-technical admins, and the API is 'challenging and intimidating initially'
  • Inconsistent and slow customer support: a stark gap - ease of use approximately 8/10 but Customer Service as low as 1.9/10 on TrustRadius; many users report support is 'slow to respond, often unhelpful, and difficult to reach,' with issues dragging on for weeks
  • Clunky legacy UI and customization limits: 'Legacy pages are very clunky and make the admin job tedious'; reviewers cite 'limited customization options, especially regarding branding, layouts, and reporting,' plus missing conveniences like archiving and flexible learning plans
05

Obi vs both

Both Skilljar and Docebo rely on overlays or guides attached to your UI, which means ongoing maintenance as your product changes. Obi takes a different approach: a conversational AI agent that learns from your docs and video and adapts in real time, with no selectors to rebuild.

Obi vs Skilljar

Skilljar and Obi solve different halves of customer education. Skilljar is where your formal curriculum lives - a polished academy of courses, certifications, and partner programs that customers can self-enroll in and complete at their own pace, with completion data flowing back to your CRM. Obi delivers education live, in the flow of work, answering 'how do I do this right now?' at the exact moment a customer is stuck - for the moments a course catalog cannot anticipate and the long tail of customers who never start or finish a formal course. Many teams run both: Skilljar for the structured curriculum and certification academy, and Obi to deliver education in the moment, for the segments and situations a course never reaches.

Obi vs Docebo

Docebo and Obi sit on different sides of the same goal - customers who actually know how to use your product. Docebo hosts and tracks the learning: it gives you a branded academy where customers enroll in structured courses, earn certifications, and where you can prove completion and compliance at scale. Obi does the educating itself, acting as an AI teammate that delivers guidance live and in-context at the exact moment a customer is stuck, and for the long tail of customers who will never sit down to take a course. Docebo's AI builds the curriculum; Obi's AI answers the question. Many teams run both: Docebo for the formal certifiable academy, and Obi for the just-in-time, in-the-flow guidance that reaches everyone the academy never will.

06

Frequently asked questions

07

Conclusion

Skilljar and Docebo address the same underlying problem but with different priorities. Skilljar scores 8/10 and Docebo scores 7.5/10 in our 2026 evaluation. Ongoing maintenance is a factor for both: Skilljar reviewers report 25-45+ hrs/month for fast-growing or multi-product teams, and Docebo reviewers report 40-80+ hrs/month. The right tool depends on your use case, team size, and how much ongoing maintenance work you can absorb. For teams that want to reduce that maintenance burden, Obi takes a different approach: a conversational AI agent that learns from your documentation and adapts automatically when your product changes, with no CSS selectors or DOM tagging required.

High-touch onboarding
for every customer.
No extra headcount.

See how Obi could handle your existing onboarding process.